|
Greenwashing affects 98 % of products |
|
|
• Thursday, 26 November 2009
According to a North American report, Seven Sins of Greenwashing, released by TerraChoice Environmental Marketing, an environmental marketing firm based in Ottawa, Canada, 98 % of products surveyed were committing one of their enumerated "sins".
"The good news is that the growing availability of green products shows
that consumers are demanding more environmentally responsible choices,
and that marketers and manufacturers are listening", said TerraChoice
President and CEO Scott McDougall. "The bad news is that TerraChoice's
survey of 2,219 consumer products in Canada and the U.S. shows that 98%
committed at least one Sin of Greenwashing and that some marketers are
exploiting consumers' demand for third-party certification by creating
fake labels or false suggestions of third-party endorsement. Despite
the number of legitimate eco-labels out there, consumers will still
have to remain vigilant in their green purchasing decisions".
The 2009 report focused on children's toys, baby products, cosmetics
and cleaning products. These products are most susceptible to
greenwashing, McDougall said.
The report also investigated the state of greenwashing in the UK and
Australia, including examining almost 1,000 products in each of these
two countries, revealing that greenwashing is an international
challenge, with at least 94 % of Australian products surveyed engaging
in the most popular sin.
According to the firm, the seven sins of greenwashing from least to most common were:
- Hidden Trade-Off - one environmental issue is emphasized at the
expense of potentially more serious concerns. In other words, when
marketing hides a trade-off between environmental issues. Paper, for
example, is not necessarily environmentally-preferable just because it
comes from a sustainably-harvested forest.
- No Proof - environmental assertions are not backed up by evidence or
third-party certification. One common example is facial tissue products
that claim various percentages of post-consumer recycled content
without providing any supporting details.
- Vagueness - a marketing claim is so lacking in specifics as to be
meaningless. For example "all-natural" can include arsenic, uranium,
mercury, and formaldehyde, which are all naturally occurring, and
poisonous.
- False Labels - a false suggestion or certification-like image to
mislead consumers into thinking that a product has been through a
legitimate green certification process. One example of this Sin is a
paper towel product whose packaging has a certification-like image that
makes the bold claim that the product ‘fights global warming.'
- Irrelevance - an environmental issue unrelated to the product is
emphasised. One example is the claim that a product is ‘CFC-free',
since CFCs are banned by law.
- Lesser of Two Evils - an environmental claim makes consumers feel
‘green' about a product category that is itself lacking in
environmental benefits. Organic cigarettes are an example.
- Fibbing - environmental claims that are outright false such as claiming false certifications.
Find out more from www.sinsofgreenwashing.org
|
-----
|
Who's Online
We have 20 guests online
|